- DTN Headline News
USDA Report Review
Friday, October 13, 2017 8:04AM CDT
By Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst

In every set of monthly USDA Crop Production and Supply and Demand reports, including the October, there are hundreds of numbers for analysts and traders to look at. The spotlight is supposed to be on corn and soybean acres since USDA "might" use official Farm Service Agency data. More often than not, though, these acreage numbers change again in January. With all these choices of numbers for traders to get excited about, including the spotlighted acres, it's interesting that this time traders decided to focus on a number that was released at the end of September.

Watching the markets rather than the numbers as they come out, as I always do, I saw November soybeans shoot 14 cents higher, then 20 cents, then 30 cents, and finally 32 cents above Wednesday's close before taking a short break. Not knowing what numbers USDA had unsealed, my initial hunch was ending stocks had to be smaller than expected. Not that I have a particularly strong insight, but simple logic indicated that was the most likely candidate.

The average pre-report guess came in at 453 million bushels, down only 22 mb from USDA's mid-September guess of 475 mb. However, between the September and October round of guesses came the September Quarterly Stocks report. There USDA reported 44 mb less than its own September estimate, 301 mb, a number that not only became the new ending stocks figure for the 2016-2017 marketing year but also beginning stocks for 2017-2018. Remember, 44 mb less than what had been previously estimated.

USDA's updated guess on 2017-2018 ending stocks on Thursday was 430 mb, certainly lower than the 453 mb average pre-report guess. But how did it relate to USDA's own previous new-crop ending stocks estimate? That's right, it was 45 mb less. So, accepting a couple rounding differences and the fact no other supply or demand guess changed for new-crop soybeans, the change in new-crop ending stocks was simply a function of the "final" ending stocks/beginning stocks number released on Sept. 29.

And that was the only number that mattered Thursday. Corn yield, production and ending stocks were all increased, and the market did indeed want to go down, but spillover buying from soybeans didn't allow that to happen. Wheat... well, it did go lower due to a 27 mb increase in domestic ending stocks and a 5 million metric ton bump in world carryover. But neither of those numbers were much of a surprise.

On the subject of surprise, there were some ag economists, post-report, left scratching their heads over USDA's decreased soybean ending stocks figure. How was it possible, given that national average yield continues to be guessed at roughly 50 bushels per acre? The answer is simple: Decreasing its domestic soybean ending stocks figure is what USDA does, with a pattern so consistent the constant overestimation seems systematic.

Though still early, only six months into a 15-month cycle of guesses, the 2017-2018 path is similar to the one USDA took during the 2015-2016 marketing year. That year, USDA started in May of 2015 with a guess of 500 mb, trimming it to 425 mb by October. This year, the high guess of 495 mb occurred in USDA's June report, before the 430 mb scribbled in the box for October. The September 2016 Quarterly Stocks report concluded that marketing year's journey with a figure of 197 mb. For now, using the average of the last four years' declines, next September could come in at 215 mb.

Based on USDA's history, everything that comes before next September's quarterly stocks number, in relation to soybean ending stocks, should be viewed as completely irrelevant.

Darin Newsom can be reached at darin.newsom@dtn.com

Follow Darin Newsom on Twitter @DarinNewsom


blog iconDTN Blogs & Forums
DTN Market Matters Blog
Editorial Staff
Friday, October 6, 2017 12:52PM CDT
Monday, October 2, 2017 11:08AM CDT
Friday, September 29, 2017 12:23PM CDT
Technically Speaking
Darin Newsom
DTN Senior Analyst
Sunday, October 15, 2017 6:00PM CDT
Sunday, October 15, 2017 5:56PM CDT
Sunday, October 15, 2017 5:54PM CDT
Fundamentally Speaking
Joel Karlin
DTN Contributing Analyst
Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:59PM CDT
Wednesday, October 11, 2017 10:44AM CDT
Friday, October 6, 2017 8:22AM CDT
DTN Ag Policy Blog
Chris Clayton
DTN Ag Policy Editor
Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:17PM CDT
Tuesday, October 17, 2017 12:57PM CDT
Monday, October 16, 2017 1:47PM CDT
Minding Ag's Business
Marcia Taylor
DTN Executive Editor
Friday, October 13, 2017 6:52PM CDT
Thursday, October 5, 2017 6:35AM CDT
Thursday, September 21, 2017 11:43AM CDT
DTN Ag Weather Forum
Bryce Anderson
DTN Ag Meteorologist and DTN Analyst
Tuesday, October 17, 2017 2:19PM CDT
Friday, October 13, 2017 1:26PM CDT
Wednesday, October 11, 2017 7:10PM CDT
DTN Production Blog
Pam Smith
Crops Technology Editor
Monday, September 18, 2017 6:14PM CDT
Friday, September 8, 2017 7:52PM CDT
Friday, September 1, 2017 2:58PM CDT
Harrington's Sort & Cull
John Harrington
DTN Livestock Analyst
Friday, October 6, 2017 1:28PM CDT
Friday, September 22, 2017 3:23PM CDT
Friday, September 1, 2017 3:27PM CDT
South America Calling
Alastair Stewart
South America Correspondent
Tuesday, October 17, 2017 1:12PM CDT
Thursday, August 24, 2017 11:32AM CDT
Wednesday, August 23, 2017 2:50PM CDT
An Urban’s Rural View
Urban Lehner
Editor Emeritus
Friday, October 13, 2017 6:36PM CDT
Thursday, October 5, 2017 6:56PM CDT
Tuesday, September 26, 2017 10:25AM CDT
Machinery Chatter
Jim Patrico
Progressive Farmer Senior Editor
Wednesday, October 11, 2017 2:06PM CDT
Monday, October 2, 2017 1:39PM CDT
Monday, September 18, 2017 1:51PM CDT
Canadian Markets
Cliff Jamieson
Canadian Grains Analyst
Tuesday, October 17, 2017 4:25PM CDT
Monday, October 16, 2017 4:11PM CDT
Friday, October 13, 2017 5:11PM CDT
Editor’s Notebook
Greg D. Horstmeier
DTN Editor-in-Chief
Tuesday, September 26, 2017 8:30AM CDT
Tuesday, August 29, 2017 4:45PM CDT
Friday, August 18, 2017 11:33AM CDT
Copyright DTN. All rights reserved. Disclaimer.
Powered By DTN